Back ] Home ] Next ]

LICK HERE TO READ "THE MONTHLY HERALD"                                         CLICK HERE  TO READ  "Herald Monthly Magazine-Extra"

CLICK HERE TO READ " THE WEEKEND SECTION OF THE HERALD"                     WRITE TO THE EDITOR ruthsielberg@monthlyherald.com

 

131

 

POINT OF VIEW. Cont'd.


Stephen Hess from the Brookings Institution says: ?Everyone who opens the mouth, makes mistakes, and we pardon them.¦ He adds that some of the exaggerations pronounced by George W. Bush are just accidental mistakes, but what is more alarming, some of them seem to be well considered. The president has an obligation to speak correctly about politics, prospective wars and about enemies of the country.
Bush-s high politics is saturated with lies; many facts are far-fetched so convincingly that people even start believing these facts. Let-s get back to Iraq. At a meeting with British Prime Minister Anthony Blair in Camp David on September 7 George W. Bush told journalists: ?I want to mention that when UNMOVIC inspectors got to Iraq for the first time, they were finally denied access; at that, the IAEA reported that Iraq was six months away from developing weapons of mass destruction. I don-t know what other evidence we need.


Another considered lie invented by the US president is a missile shield.

The IAEA actually issued a report in 1998, approximately at the time when the inspectors were not allowed to Iraq last time, but the report contained no resolutions of this kind. It said: ?Based on reliable information, the IAEA discovered no evidence of Iraq-s success in development of nuclear weapons, no evidence of Iraq-s capabilities for weapons development or evidence proving that Iraq illegally obtained nuclear materials for weapons development.¦ It was also reported that Iraq had been 24 months away from developing weapons of mass destruction before the 1991 Gulf War. The White House declared that George W. Bush was ?not correct¦ with the statement, as it was not the IAEA, but the US Intelligence that was the source of the information. It might be called a trivial detail, but the US-s large-scale politics is based upon such details.
Another considered lie invented by the US president is a missile shield. In December 2002, President Bush declared that the USA would create the first effective system of anti-missile defense in 2004 already. This is the most important promise concerning national security that had been made during the pre-election campaign. The president of America decided to keep the promise because of threats from such countries as North Korea, and also because of the increasing danger of an alliance to be made up by those terrorist groups and countries that have weapons capable to reach the USA. Until recently, eight tests of an anti-missile defense system were held. During the tests, a missile launched in California was to intercept and liquidate a missile launched by the enemy from an island in the Pacific Ocean. Three of the tests failed, but the White House declared that data obtained during the test were encouraging for realization of a project at the cost of not less than 60 billion dollars. The company Raytheon got the order for creation of a nuclear shield, and Lincoln Laboratory, a structure of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology financed from the federal funds, worked on scientific substantiation of the project and supported it. However, Professor Postol from the same institution sticks to a different opinion. In his words, results of the tests were forged in order to create an impression that the system performed much better than it actually did in fact. The scholar said that together with a group of scientists he had sent a letter to the Congress to say that interceptor missiles couldn-t distinguish real missiles from abstractive ones. If the scientists are right, enemies can easily deliver a blow against the USA with the help of real carriers with abstractive missiles, and this is not a fantasy. The order for making sensor systems responsible for defining targets was given to the company Twr. Despite the fact that the Massachusetts Institute of Technology confirmed effectiveness of the systems, Twr staffer Nira Schwarz blamed the leadership of the company of data manipulation. La Stampa reports, the US Congress-s General Accounting Office confirmed the credibility of claims laid by Schwarz.

Dmitry Litvinovich. PRAVDA.Ru

 

Back ] Home ] Next ]

LICK HERE TO READ "THE MONTHLY HERALD"                                         CLICK HERE  TO READ  "Herald Monthly Magazine-Extra"

CLICK HERE TO READ " THE WEEKEND SECTION OF THE HERALD"                     WRITE TO THE EDITOR ruthsielberg@monthlyherald.com