Contents P1 Contents P2 Contents P3 Contents P4 Contents P5 Contents P6 Contents P7 Contents P8 Contents 9
242
242
ENTERTAINMENT: TELEVISION SHOWS AND NEWS
DRAMA. COMEDY. SOAP. REALITY TV.


Photos from L to R: #1.Matthew Perry. #2. Courteney Cox Arquette.
One example, The One With the Birth Mother: Chandler and Monica meet with the expectant mother whose child they hope to adopt, but she almost backs out. Chandler makes a moving speech and saves the day. Meanwhile, Rachel and Phoebe help Ross dress for a date, but he looks nerdier than ever. And Phoebe sends Joey on a blind date, who at dinner proves perfect in all ways except -- for Joey, a cardinal sin -- she eats off his plate. "There's a lot of interweaving, a lot of juggling," says Crane. "One character is the go-to person in another character's story. Then, next time, you have to shift it around." Of course, the magic of Friends wasn't simply its sitcom sextet, but also the magic little world they shared, observes Syracuse University television scholar Robert Thompson. Most sitcoms rely on an authority figure: a parent, a boss, a domineering spouse or even a bossy pal. But Friends took place in a realm free of authority figures, says Thompson, likening it to The Brady Bunch, of all things, "if Mike and Carol had walked around the corner for a pack of smokes and never come back." "The theme song says 'Always stuck in second gear,' and they were: In their 20s, between adolescence and adulthood," he says. "And that, of course, is the dream of everyone: To maintain the ethos of life in a college dorm, beyond college." Another distinguishing factor of Friends: lack of conflict between the characters, reported the AP.Where the plots and humour on most sitcoms depend on characters butting heads (or at least zinging each other with put-downs), the Friends friends "really care about each other, and act like it," says David Bushman, a curator at the Museum of Television and Radio. Most of what goes on between these six, says Bushman, is friendship demonstrated in funny or touching ways. In place of conflict is something more subtle, but just as powerful: a subtext of sexual tension pushing and pulling at these three red-blooded guys and three lovely gals who, as the song pledges, will "be there for you." Sometimes it's more than a subtext. Besides the courtship and marriage of Chandler and Monica, and the Ross-and-Rachel romance, Joey had a fling with Phoebe (although he thought she was her twin sister, Ursula) and made a play for Rachel, among other connections. Turns out, staying just friends isn't easy. (For the record: Siblings Ross and Monica maintained proper decorum with each other.) No reports ever surfaced of actual romance among the six Friends stars. Nonetheless, their real-life friendship clearly stayed in synch with that of their characters. And lucratively so, especially at contract negotiation time, when their unified front won them most recently a reported deal of $1 million per episode and a piece of the show's syndication profits. "With their collective bargaining," says Thompson with a laugh, "they had the most effective union of the last decade." "Certainly the renegotiation periods were hard," admits Crane, "but besides the fact that their unity was a powerful negotiating tool, it created a very healthy working environment. They knew no one was going to sell them out. So we never had to deal with any sense of mistrust. "Even more important than the fact that they might sometimes hang out together away from the show is that, as actors, they were generous with each other." Detractors of Friends (and they do exist) call the series shallow, contrived and too cute by half. But no one disputes the co-stars' chemistry, or their skill for giving their characters an authenticity that flourished far beyond the bounds of the show's basic formula. Look no further than quick-witted, self-deprecating Chandler. "He could have been just a comic device," says Crane, "but we had Matthew in the role, so we could eventually turn Chandler into a leading man." The casting process was onerous, Crane recalls. No way could one character fade into the woodwork, or vanish from the show altogether, if the star didn't work out. Nor could any one of them overwhelm the others. The pressure to get the right six actors was huge. "We saw everybody! Hundreds of actors!" says Crane, sounding weary at the memory. "Then we cast them individually, so we never saw them all together." But when the Chosen Six rehearsed the pilot for the first time, "you had the feeling that these were people who had been acting together for years. It was like Season Three of the show!" Thursday night, Season 10 comes to a close as Friends takes its place in TV annals for its popularity and endurance. But in between the tears and hype, Friends invites a game of what-if: What if one of the stars, or one of the characters, had been a dud? What if a feud among the cast had led to someone's defection? What if one of the actors had exited along the way in pursuit of even greater stardom, as several of them were tempted to do? What then? "Would we have introduced a new 'sixth friend'? The answer is no," says Crane emphatically. No need. "The other five would have been so strong. Besides, I don't know if there's any magic in the number six." Maybe not. Except this time, wrote Frazier Moor.