|
A newspaper film critic has questioned whether
adults will be able to stomach the violence in Mel
Gibson's imminent movie The Passion of the Christ.
The film has
already caused controversy for allegedly provoking
anti-Semitism. But few film critics have had the
opportunity to review it to provide a non-religious
take on it. Telegraph critic John Hiscock, providing
the first UK review, said there is "little respite"
from violence in the film. The Passion of the Christ
gets its US release on 25 February and comes out in
the UK on 26 March. The uproar from religious bodies,
including Jewish groups which feared it may lead to
anti-Semitism, has ensured it has continually hit
headlines. It is filmed entirely in Latin and ancient
Aramaic with English subtitles, and has gained
publicity through Gibson inviting Catholic groups
along to see it, with many lauding it for telling the
"truth" about the crucifixion of Jesus. The Vatican
also denied reports that the Pope had given his
approval to the film. Mr. Hiscock believes the
anti-violence lobby could soon take an interest in the
film. He wrote: "For, worthy and serious as Gibson's
treatment may be, his blood-drenched depiction of the
final hours of Jesus' life is harsh and brutal,
dwelling almost entirely on pain, suffering and
torment."
The film has
dialogue in Latin and Aramaic
|
He said
whippings and beatings are shown in graphic close-up
as Jesus' flesh is "torn and battered".
'Dignified'
Although not
marketed for children, "adults are likely to have
problems with the vivid depictions of pain and
violence", he added. Gibson has already reportedly cut
some of the most brutal scenes.
Mr. Hiscock's
review reported that lead actor Jim Caviezel makes an
"impressive, dignified Jesus". But he said that within
10 minutes Jesus is being subjected to beatings at the
hands of Jewish and Roman guards, while the second
half of the film is devoted to the crucifixion. While
there are flashback scenes, the "respites are all too
brief" from the violence, wrote Mr. Hiscock. He added
that it was "difficult to know who would want to see a
film this violent". But he believes American audiences
more comfortable with violence than sex on screen, and
the controversy it has caused will recoup the personal
millions Gibson has spent on it.
|