REACHING 3,000.000 READERS A MONTH AROUND THE GLOBE
6 SUPER DUPER INTERNATIONAL MONTHLY MAGAZINES & 1 DAILY WORLD NEWS EDITION ON LINE
CLICK HERE TO READ MONTHLY HERALD (May Issue) CLICK HERE TO READ MONTHLY HERALD (June Issue) CLICK HERE TO READ HERALD MAGAZINE CLICK HERE TO READ THE WEEKEND PAPER CLICK HERE TO READ WORLD ARTS & CULTURE MAGAZINE CLICK HERE TO READ HERALD TIMES PARADE CLICK HERE TO READ THE ATLANTIC HERALD TRIBUNE CLICK HERE TO READ ARTS & CULTURE MAGAZINE (SPECIAL ISSUE)
CLICK HERE TO READ EVERY DAY THE INTERNATIONAL HERALD DAILY NEWS (NEWS AROUND THE CLOCK. 24 HOURS A DAY) CLICK HERE TO GO TO THE ARCHIVES (Monthly Herald Previous Issues)
INTERNATIONAL HERALD
DAILY NEWS ON LINE
CLICK HERE
Click here to go to the beginning of this issue
129
CRITICAL ISSUES AND WORLD AFFAIRS
ZINNI ACCUSATIONS: US WAS PUSHED TO FIGHT IRAQ TO BENEFIT ISRAEL
By Orin Nir Eden
Photo:
Ret. Gen. Anthony Zinni once commanded America's troops in the Middle
East. Retired General Anthony Zinni is one of the most respected and outspoken
military leaders of the past two decades.
The simmering debate over the
role of Jewish neoconservatives in drawing America into war in Iraq erupted
with new fury this week. One of America's most respected ex-generals took to
the airwaves to charge on CBS News' "60 Minutes" that the war had been fought
for Israel's benefit, just days after a similar charge was leveled on the
floor of the U.S. Senate. The retired general, Anthony Zinni, a past chief of
the U.S. Central Command and President Bush's former Middle East special
envoy, told "60 Minutes" on Sunday that the neoconservatives' role in pushing
the war for Israel's benefit was "the worst-kept secret in Washington." Three
days earlier, Senator Ernest "Fritz" Hollings, a South Carolina Democrat, rose
on the Senate floor to defend a newspaper essay he had written earlier in the
month making the same charge. Both men complained that they had been unfairly
labeled antisemitic for speaking out. Their comments come just weeks after the
United Nations' special envoy to Iraq, Lakhdar Brahimi, called Israel a
"poison in the region" and said that American support for Israeli policies was
making his job more difficult. In the face of these mounting criticisms, a
leading Jewish Democrat on Capitol Hill, Rep. Nita Lowey of New York,
told the Forward that the president's policies were increasing the danger to
Jews across the world. "We are very worried about the rise of antisemitism
internationally," said Lowey in an interview Monday with the Forward. She
argued that disdain for the president and his policies has "stirred up"
antisemitic feelings worldwide. "It's a real concern for me as a Jewish member
of Congress."

Lowey's
comments drew sharp criticisms from officials at the Anti-Defamation League
and the American Jewish Congress. "That's absurd," said the ADL's national
director, Abraham Foxman, when informed of Lowey's comments. "It's worse than
blaming the victim. It's blaming someone who stands up for the victim." David
Twersky, the director of international programs at the American Jewish
Congress, also objected, telling the Forward: "Without being partisan about
it, I am appalled that anyone should attribute the rise of antisemitism in the
Islamic world, and separately in Western Europe, to George Bush's policies in
the Middle East." One Democratic activist, who asked not to be identified,
defended Lowey's comments: "There is certainly a strong stream within the
party, and particularly among progressives — and many Jews are progressives —
that George Bush's inability to play well with others and his inability to
think diplomatically and multinationally ... has increased world hatred of the
United States. There are many in the Arab world who believe that America is
run by and owned by Jews. So it is not that hard to get from A to B. I tend to
think that any independent analyst would tend to say the same thing. So why
try to give [Bush] the benefit of the doubt? If he could connect these dots it
would modify his behavior and make him think more diplomatically." The Bush
administration also was portrayed as reckless by Gen. Anthony Zinni during his
interview with "60 Minutes," in which he said it "was the worst-kept secret in
Washington" that neoconservatives had sold Bush and Secretary of Defense
Donald Rumsfeld on a plan to democratize the Middle East.
Those remarks drew criticisms
from officials at both the National Jewish Democratic Council and the
Republican Jewish Coalition. Just three days before Zinni's interview was
broadcast, Hollings took to the Senate floor to defend his little-noticed
claim earlier this month that Bush sent the country to war in order to win
Jewish votes and protect Israel, after consulting with Deputy Secretary of
Defense Paul Wolfowitz, Under Secretary of Defense Douglas Feith and Richard
Perle, the former chairman of the Pentagon's Defense Policy Board. In his May
20 floor speech, Hollings also blasted the policies of Israeli Prime Minister
Ariel Sharon and the influence of the American Israel Public Affairs
Committee, the lobbying powerhouse in Washington known as Aipac. "You can't
have an Israel policy other than what Aipac gives you around here," Hollings
said. "I have followed them mostly in the main, but I have also resisted
signing certain letters from time to time, to give the poor president a
chance." Hollings said he was motivated by a concern for Israel, which he
insisted has been threatened by the turmoil in Iraq. But the South Carolina
senator drew sharp criticism from Jewish communal leaders, Jewish political
activists from both parties, and Democratic and Republican lawmakers,
including Senator John Kerry Foxman sent Hollings a letter May 14 arguing that
the senator's remarks were "reminiscent of age-old, antisemitic canards about
a Jewish conspiracy to control and manipulate the government."
During his floor speech, Hollings spoke angrily about critics who raised such
claims. "I won't apologize," Hollings declared during a May 20 speech from the
Senate floor. "I want them to apologize to me." Zinni sounded a similar note
in his "60 Minutes" interview, complaining that he was "called antisemitic"
for writing an article in which he mentioned Bush's neoconservative advisers.
"I mean, you know, unbelievable that that's the kind of personal attacks that
are run when you criticize a strategy and those who propose it," Zinni said.
"I certainly didn't criticize who they were. I certainly don't know what their
ethnic religious backgrounds are. And I'm not interested."
Continues on the following
pages.